Re: [LTP] [PATCH/RFE 2/2] mm: use new numa_helper

[Caspar Z. <ca...@ca...>]

On 08/01/2012 06:23 PM, Jan Stancek wrote:
> I noticed you put call to "get_a_numa_node()" to "oom()" and "testoom()",
> which is called also from oom01. As I understand from your previous
> email, this test should not be NUMA-aware, correct?

I missed a `if (mempolicy)` inside oom() {....} :-(

Nice catch! Thanks!

Caspar

>
> <<<test_start>>>
> tag=oom01 stime=1343713154
> cmdline="oom01"
> contacts=""
> analysis=exit
> <<<test_output>>>
> oom01       0  TINFO  :  set overcommit_memory to 2
> oom01       1  TCONF  :  require a NUMA system.
> oom01       2  TCONF  :  Remaining cases not appropriate for configuration
> oom01       0  TINFO  :  set overcommit_memory to 0
> <<<execution_status>>>
>
> Regards,
> Jan