From: James T. <tak...@us...> - 2011-08-25 17:48:24
|
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 12:17:15, Cyril Hrubis <ch...@su...> wrote: > > I'm not happy to have tarballs stored in the git for several reasons. Is > this really needed? Shouldn't having directories with files serve the > same purpose? The tarball form makes more sense since we want to select and extract only one of the available schedules. These schedule tarballs already exist in the git repository. Lucy's patch merely moved them all into their own subdirectory to improve the file organization. In fact, she even removed one, so now there are only 3 instead of 4 :-) |