Re: [LTP] Fix warning at cpuset_syscall_test.c

[ERAMOTO M. <era...@jp...>]

Hi Garrett,

> 1. Negative return values from main are bad.
> 2. 0 would be better, otherwise it's going to cause more churn on the
> list because people without the support are going to start asking the
> question: "why is this testcase failing"?
>
> I'll implement return 0 instead.

I ACK it.

Thanks you for your explanation,
ERAMOTO