From: Subrata M. <su...@li...> - 2010-09-06 16:17:21
|
Garret, this patch ? Regards-- Subrata On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 12:36 +0200, Yang, Wei wrote: > Hi > > When running shmat01 on some platforms, it fails on > "addr = shmat(*(tc.shmid), base_addr + tc.offset,tc.flags);" > with a INVAL error. Look at codes in "setup()", it probes > an available address and align the address to SHMLBA. After > alignment, the new address is no guarantee to be available > any more. Here a bigger size is used to probe so that it's > still valid address after alignment.Pertaining to the function > setup_tc(lc, &tc) ,when it outside of "for (i = 0; i < TST_TOTAL; > i++)",and printf the tc.offset value is always 0,add correct a mistake > of original codes to move "setup_tc()" to right place. > > Signed-off-by: Yang Wei <wei...@wi...> > > wei yang > BR > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: > > Show off your parallel programming skills. > Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd > _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list |