From: Akira F. <a-f...@rs...> - 2010-06-21 08:26:02
|
Hi Subrata, > Akira, > > Probably we need to change the tests conditions to restrict not to cross > the size of partition. We can handle the tests better i think. I am not > sure if the last commit is playing foul with the tests: > > commit 7f20a3add6c7f2166dbab5a712713ae8b5943448 > Author: Subrata Modak<sub...@su...> > Date: Wed Jun 2 18:16:46 2010 +0530 Yes, we should check ext4 partition size and configure fssb write size before testing. AFAIK, ext4-subdir-limit test does not depend on partition size, and over 32000 directory feature is not supported in case 1KB block size and long directory name. So I think my fix (just skip invalid test case) is okay. Reference: linux/Documentation/filesystems/ext4.txt * lift 32000 subdirectory limit imposed by i_links_count[1] [1] Filesystems with a block size of 1k may see a limit imposed by the directory hash tree having a maximum depth of two. Regards, Akira Fujita (2010/06/19 2:30), Subrata Modak wrote: > Yes, i find many failures in the tests including dumping of BINARY > characters on this screen. Following are excerpts of the failures: > > ext4-journal-checksum 7 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure > ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: ordered, commit > interval: 1, > ext4-journal-checksum 8 TPASS : ext4 journal checksum test pass > ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: journal, commit > interval: 1, > ext4-journal-checksum 9 TPASS : ext4 journal checksum test pass > ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit > interval: 100, > write: No space left on device > write: No space left on device > write: No space left on device > ]�0��������]�@]����O�����0�碘 > �pA��,�]�]�]�]�]�]�]�]�]P]�p��������]����N�����0�����pA��$�]��]����������]�������0�pA��$�]��]����������]������0�pw�]}���������]~]P�������0�マ��pA��,�]�]�]�]���O]�]�]�]}]�0��������]�@]����O�����0�碘�pA��,�]�]�]�]�]�]�]�]�]P]�p��������]����N�����0�����pA��$�]��]����������]�������0�pA��$�]��]����������]������0�pw� > > Akira, > > Probably we need to change the tests conditions to restrict not to cross > the size of partition. We can handle the tests better i think. I am not > sure if the last commit is playing foul with the tests: > > commit 7f20a3add6c7f2166dbab5a712713ae8b5943448 > Author: Subrata Modak<sub...@su...> > Date: Wed Jun 2 18:16:46 2010 +0530 > > Regards-- > Subrata > > On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 11:39 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: >> Hi Lucio, >> >> Till now i did not detect any failure for the sdb2: >> >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO: >> 0, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1 >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 1 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO: >> 0, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: noauto_da_alloc >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 2 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: nodelalloc, >> isDirectIO: 0, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1 >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 3 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: nodelalloc, >> isDirectIO: 0, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: noauto_da_alloc >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 4 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO: >> 1, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1 >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 5 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO: >> 1, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: noauto_da_alloc >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 6 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: nodelalloc, >> isDirectIO: 1, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1 >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 7 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: nodelalloc, >> isDirectIO: 1, Blocksize: 1024, isAuto_da_alloc: noauto_da_alloc >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 8 TPASS : delalloc/mballoc test pass >> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO: >> 0, Blocksize: 4096, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1 >> >> I will continue to run the tests and update you again. >> >> Regards-- >> Subrata >> >> On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 18:12 -0300, Lucio Correia wrote: >>> Hi Akira, >>> >>> I've found some failures running ext4-newfeat with SLES11sp1 on POWER6. >>> Have you seen that before? >>> >>> >>> >>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO: >>> 0, >>> Blocksize: 4096, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1 >>> write: No space left on device >>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 9 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure >>> >>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: >>> 1, >>> write: No space left on device >>> write: No space left on device >>> write: No space left on device >>> write: No space left on device >>> ext4-journal-checksum 1 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure >>> >>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: >>> 100, >>> write: No space left on device >>> write: No space left on device >>> write: No space left on device >>> ext4-journal-checksum 4 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure >>> >>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: >>> 1, >>> write: Success >>> write: Success >>> write: No space left on device >>> ext4-journal-checksum 7 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure >>> >>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: >>> 100, >>> write: No space left on device >>> write: No space left on device >>> ext4-journal-checksum 10 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure >>> >>> and so on 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34. >>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 0 TINFO : isDelalloc: delalloc, isDirectIO: >>> 0, >>> Blocksize: 4096, isAuto_da_alloc: auto_da_alloc=1 >>> write: No space left on device >>> ext4-delalloc-mballoc 9 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure >>> >>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: >>> 1, >>> write: No space left on device >>> write: No space left on device >>> write: No space left on device >>> write: No space left on device >>> ext4-journal-checksum 1 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure >>> >>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: >>> 100, >>> write: No space left on device >>> write: No space left on device >>> write: No space left on device >>> ext4-journal-checksum 4 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure >>> >>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: >>> 1, >>> write: Success >>> write: Success >>> write: No space left on device >>> ext4-journal-checksum 7 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure >>> >>> ext4-journal-checksum 0 TINFO : journal mode: writeback, commit interval: >>> 100, >>> write: No space left on device >>> write: No space left on device >>> ext4-journal-checksum 10 TFAIL : ffsb returned failure >>> >>> and so on 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34. >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> >>> >>> Lucio Correia >>> -------------- >>> Software Engineer >>> IBM LTC >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate >>> GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the >>> lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Ltp-list mailing list >>> Ltp...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate >> GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the >> lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo >> _______________________________________________ >> Ltp-list mailing list >> Ltp...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list > > -- Akira Fujita <a-f...@rs...> The First Fundamental Software Development Group, Software Development Division, NEC Software Tohoku, Ltd. |