From: Garrett C. <yan...@gm...> - 2010-02-24 22:22:32
|
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Murlin Wenzel <mw...@no...> wrote: >>>> On 2/24/2010 at 02:25 PM, in message > <364...@ma...>, Garrett Cooper > <yan...@gm...> wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Murlin Wenzel <mw...@no...> wrote: >>>>>> On 2/24/2010 at 02:16 PM, in message >>> <364...@ma...>, Garrett Cooper >>> <yan...@gm...> wrote: >>>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Murlin Wenzel <mw...@no...> wrote: >>>>> This cleans up existing swap files in swapon03 test in failing test case. >>>> Otherwise, deleted swap files would still exist in /proc/swaps. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Murlin Ray Wenzel mw...@no... >>>> >>>> Why not implement this as part of cleanup? >>>> Thanks, >>>> -Garrett >>> >>> I can look at doing that. I just grabbed the closest place that worked for >> me. BTW I'm still looking at a possible kernel bug where you can't allocate >> the maximum number of swap files. >> >> What kernel version are you working with? >> -Garrett > > I'm testing on 2.6.32.7, but I've been told that the same problem doesn't happen on 2.6.33 and it shouldn't happen on some as yet unknown previous versions. If they changed the maximum number of swap files, then this would be the cause for the problem as it's set to 30 since 2.6.18. See include/swaponoff.h . HTH, -Garrett |