Re: [LTP] [ANNOUNCEMENT]: Intermediate release for FEB'10

[Garrett C. <yan...@gm...>]

On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Rishikesh K Rajak
<ris...@li...> wrote:
> Hi Iranna,
>
>
> Thanks for reporting this build failure and helping, as it will
> really help to make ltp more stable.
>
> Here is the quick patch i am attaching which solves the problem.
>
> Signed-off By: Rishikesh K Rajak<ris...@li...>
> Tested By: Rishikesh K Rajak<ris...@li...>
> ---
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/mbind/mbind01.c
> b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/mbind/mbind01.c
> index 5d7eb69..847186a 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/mbind/mbind01.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/mbind/mbind01.c
> @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ int  TST_TOTAL = 2;           /* total number of tests
> in this file.   */
>  #include <unistd.h>
>  #include "include_j_h.h"
>  #include "numa_helpers.h"
> +#include <linux/mempolicy.h>
>
>  #if ! defined(LIBNUMA_API_VERSION) || LIBNUMA_API_VERSION < 2

No. This patch shouldn't be committed because of namespace collisions
between numa and mempolicy (thank the developers for just copy-pasting
constants, macros, etc instead of properly requiring numa on the
target system in order for mempolicy to work...).

Thanks,
-Garrett