[Ltp-cvs] ltp/testcases/kernel/syscalls/move_pages move_pages_support.c, 1.3, 1.4

[Subrata <sub...@us...>]

Update of /cvsroot/ltp/ltp/testcases/kernel/syscalls/move_pages
In directory ddv4jf1.ch3.sourceforge.com:/tmp/cvs-serv23367/ltp/testcases/kernel/syscalls/move_pages

Modified Files:
	move_pages_support.c 
Log Message:
Other compiler warning fixes: this is another chunk of compiler warning fixes in LTP tests, related to printf format strings. They have multiple causes:
- most of them are caused by %d used for the TEST_RETURN variable (as in a previous patch),
- off_t are cast to (int64_t) and PRId64 output specifier is used for them,
- other types are cast to (intmax_t) or (uintmax_t) and use the %jd or %ju (C99) output specifier. I've used this solution because it's generally correct, easy to use solution that is portable and (IMHO) more readable than using PRId64/PRIu64 and a cast (which you generally can't avoid). This way, there's only a cast,
- in ioperm test, address should be declared as unsigned long (according to ioperm(2)),
- other little fixes (foo vs. *foo, %S vs. %s, %0 vs. %o).
Signed-off-by: Jiri Palecek <jpa...@we...>.


Index: move_pages_support.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/ltp/ltp/testcases/kernel/syscalls/move_pages/move_pages_support.c,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -C2 -d -r1.3 -r1.4
*** move_pages_support.c	9 Oct 2009 17:55:58 -0000	1.3
--- move_pages_support.c	2 Nov 2009 13:57:17 -0000	1.4
***************
*** 190,194 ****
  		if (status[i] != nodes[i]) {
  			tst_resm(TFAIL, "page %d on node %d, "
! 				 "expected on node %p", i, status[i], nodes[i]);
  			return;
  		}
--- 190,194 ----
  		if (status[i] != nodes[i]) {
  			tst_resm(TFAIL, "page %d on node %d, "
! 				 "expected on node %d", i, status[i], nodes[i]);
  			return;
  		}