From: Jiří P. <jpa...@we...> - 2009-10-25 23:44:36
|
On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 20:22:00 +0200, Subrata Modak <su...@li...> wrote: > Jiri, > > Any further thoughts on this ? Yes, see the attachment. I created the directories for the different tests (rt_sigtimedwait, sigwaitinfo etc.), but to avoid copy-pasting the code, they share the same source. Please, tell me if that is OK. Regards Jiri Palecek > On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 17:43 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: >> Hey Jiri, >> >> On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 16:28 +0200, Jiří Paleček wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > I've decided to create a test for the rt_sigwaitinfo syscall. There >> are >> > other functions with similar interface (defined by POSIX) in libc - >> > particularly sigwait, sigtimedwait and sigwaitinfo. The rt_sigwaitinfo >> >> The sigwait, sigtimedwait and sigwaitinfo testcases are not in LTP. >> >> > test could easily tests these too, so I wonder whether we want to test >> > these too, and if yes, whether these tests can be located in the same >> > executable. >> >> If you already have the logic to write the above tests, then please >> create separate tests for sigwait, sigtimedwait and sigwaitinfo >> (separate directories as well), and separate for rt_sigwaitinfo syscall. >> >> Regards-- >> Subrata >> >> > >> > Regards >> > Jiri Palecek >> > >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA >> is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your >> developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and >> stay >> ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference >> _______________________________________________ >> Ltp-list mailing list >> Ltp...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list > -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ |