Re: [LTP] [FIX PATCHE] rt_sigaction

[naresh k. <nar...@gm...>]

On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:08 PM, naresh kamboju<nar...@gm...> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 5:29 AM, Garrett Cooper<yan...@gm...> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 10:26 AM, naresh kamboju<nar...@gm...> wrote:
>>> Garrett,
> result = 0
>>>> rt_sigaction01    0  INFO  :  sa.sa_flags = SA_RESETHAND|SA_SIGINFO
>>>>
>>>> Program received signal SIG34, Real-time event 34.
>>>> 0x00007f770ba0b4f7 in kill () from /lib/libc.so.6
>>>> (gdb) where
>>>> #0  0x00007f770ba0b4f7 in kill () from /lib/libc.so.6
>>>> #1  0x0000000000401c3e in main ()
>>>> (gdb)
>>>>
>>>
>>>  /lib/libc.so.6 :
>>>
>>> This could be issue with glibc.
>>> Are you using 2.9 glibc?
>>>
>>> please Investigate.
>>
>>    Yes, I am:
>>
>> gcooper@orangebox /scratch/ltp-vanilla/ltp $ emerge -qpv glibc
>> [ebuild   R   ] sys-libs/glibc-2.9_p20081201-r2  USE="(multilib) nls
>> -debug -gd -glibc-omitfp (-hardened) -profile (-selinux) -vanilla"
>> gcooper@orangebox /scratch/ltp-vanilla/ltp $
>>
>>    Are you suggesting this might be a glibc bug?
>
> I hope... its not a bug with glibc.
>
> please run following command
> #/lib/libc.so.6
>
> Is it generating information about glibc and gcc ??
>
> I have tried it on 2.6.29 kernels and glibc 2.9 on X86-32 bit
> These test got passed.
>
> Because of that I could not conclude its glibc bug !!!
>
> These test cases are PASSED on ARM/MIPS/X86
> I did not check with x86- 64 bit ARCH, becz HardWare is not available.
>
> Subrata,
>
> Have you tested these test cases at your end.
> if not please conform the results.
> after applying Garrett date on

After applying Garrett patch dated on Jul 7th 2009
SUB: RE: [LTP] Compile failure with rt_sigaction on amd64

>
> Best regards
> Naresh Kamboju
>
>> -Garrett
>>
>