From: Eric S. <sa...@sa...> - 2008-08-29 18:09:09
|
Subrata Modak wrote: > On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 09:45 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> Historically tarballs haven't been made, nor has xfstests been packaged, >> but it's in cvs: http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/xfs-cmds/xfstests/ > > Hmmm. I went through the code in your CVS. I noticed that although the > SGI copyright is mentioned, but most of the code does not include the > GPL license definition. Like, you have only this now: > > #----------------------------------------------------------------------- > # Copyright (c) 2000-2001 Silicon Graphics, Inc. All Rights Reserved. > #----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Now, if include this code inside LTP, i will have things like this: > > #----------------------------------------------------------------------- > # Copyright (c) 2000-2001 Silicon Graphics, Inc. All Rights Reserved. > #----------------------------------------------------------------------- > /* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify > */ > /* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by */ > /* the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or */ > /* (at your option) any later version. */ > /* */ > /* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, */ > /* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of */ > /* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See */ > /* the GNU General Public License for more details. */ > /* */ > /* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License */ > /* along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software */ > /* Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA */ > > I was not able to find authors for all those code, expect few of the following gentlemen: > ke...@sg..., > dx...@sg..., > lo...@sg..., > > Now, if somebody amongst them, or anybody having written that code says that he/she > does not have any problem this code being contributed to LTP by simply Signing it > off like Signed-Off-By:xy...@12..., will be helpful. If you do not have any > objection in me including that code in LTP (i will actually have that GPL license > definition in every code), then you can just reply to this mail with a Sign-off. > That will help. Well, any code I have contributed to the xfs test suite can certainly be included in the LTP, and for that: Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sa...@sa...> or, used to be: Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sa...@sg...> But SGI (Mark?) can you guys go through and make sure the test suite is all explicitly, obviously GPL, if that's the intent? Thanks, -Eric |