From: Michael K. <mtk...@go...> - 2008-07-11 11:27:37
|
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Subrata Modak <su...@li...> wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 15:45 -0400, Jeff Burke wrote: [...] > There should not be a failure for Build/Install when Kernel is >= > 2.6.22, when this syscall was introduced. May be we need to check out > why it failed to build/install. > > The know failures are, out of 99 scenarios that Michael was testing, > roughly 33 of them were failing on 2.6.25. The long story is here: http://linux-man-pages.blogspot.com/2008/06/whats-wrong-with-kernel-userland_30.html > And Michael was working with > the syscall developer Actually the original developer was not must to be heard from. But Miklos was helpful. > to get those fixes, and he himself gave some > fixes. My set of four patches was merged into 2.6.26-rc9, so everything that I know of should be fixed Real Soon Now. Cheers, Michael -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ man-pages online: http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online_pages.html Found a bug? http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html |