From: Subrata M. <su...@li...> - 2008-01-03 07:18:06
|
On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 13:04 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 14:04:49 -0600 George Kraft wrote: > > > On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 11:32 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > ltp-tstres-001: 20071231 > > > Provides LTP standard common output test results command-line tools > > > that can be used by other testing projects so that all can share a > > > common test results output format. > > > > Would it make sense to have an ltp-devel *package* that contains the > > usctest APIs and PAN for standalone test creation? Hi George, Can you please exemplify more on how this can be achieved. May be some design doc for this. We will definitely take this forward if it is really help full for us. But i would like to convey that LTP log library function like tst_res, tst_brok,etc are already implemented in command line format. And infact these binaries are used by SHELL Script test cases to report information (PASS,FAIL,INFO,BROK,etc) to the log libraries. --Subrata > > Probably, although PAN might be overkill since there are other > auto-test control systems, so the package could be useful, > with use of PAN being optional, of course. > > --- > ~Randy > desserts: http://www.xenotime.net/linux/recipes/ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Ltp-list mailing list > Ltp...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list |