From: Michael H. <hoh...@us...> - 2003-01-21 01:09:42
|
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 14:28, Andrew Morton wrote: > Ingo Molnar <mi...@el...> wrote: > > > > > > the attached patch (against 2.5.59) is my current scheduler tree, it > > includes two main areas of changes: > > > > - interactivity improvements, mostly reworked bits from Andrea's tree and > > various tunings. > > > > Thanks for doing this. Initial testing with one workload which is extremely > bad with 2.5.59: huge improvement. > Initial testing on my NUMA box looks good. So far, I only have kernbench numbers, but the system time shows a nice decrease, and the CPU % busy time has gone up. Kernbench: Elapsed User System CPU ingoD7-59 28.944s 285.008s 79.998s 1260.8% stock59 29.668s 283.762s 82.286s 1233% I'll try to get more testing in over the next few days. There was one minor build error introduced by the patch: #define NODE_THRESHOLD 125 was removed, but the NUMA code uses this. -- Michael Hohnbaum 503-578-5486 hoh...@us... T/L 775-5486 |