From: Kimio S. <k-s...@mv...> - 2002-10-01 16:45:37
|
On Tue, 01 Oct 2002 09:25:15 -0700 "Martin J. Bligh" <mb...@ar...> wrote: > >> Erich, does your NEC machine run OK with discontigmem support for > >> ia64 with no patches on mainline or -mm? Or do you have a secret > >> stash of patches somewhere that we could see to make your machine > >> work? > > > > Our machine rearranges the physical memory to present it more or less > > linearly (and starting from 0) to the OS. Therefore we can boot with > > 2.5 but don't have per-node zones yet. So we need something much simpler > > than SGI. In 2.4.X we use only per node zonelists for the production > > kernels, but for 2.5 we'd like to have discontigmem. Kimi is currently > > looking into this, I'm tied up with other stuff the next few days :-/ > > OK, well please publish what you have ASAP, even if it's somewhat > half-baked at first ... would be nice to get the stuff apart from > discontig-inside-node merged at least - that's the hardest chunk > of it all, I suspect. First, I'll just port the current discontig-core patch to 2.5. And then I'll think about using config_nonlinear, I'm not sure will it work on IA64 though. > Is there still a huge external ia64 patch for 2.5 you need, or is that > all merged now? Not so huge. About 6k lines for 2.5.39. Regards, Kimi -- Kimio Suganuma <k-s...@mv...> |