Re: [Lse-tech] Where should benchmark data really go?

[Hubertus F. <fr...@us...>]

I think LBS is for posting benchmarks and not benchmark results (my take).

Hubertus Franke
Enterprise Linux Group (Mgr),  Linux Technology Center (Member Scalability)
, OS-PIC (Chair)
email: fr...@us...
(w) 914-945-2003    (fax) 914-945-4425   TL: 862-2003



Andrew Theurer <an...@au...>@lists.sourceforge.net on 07/10/2001
06:02:46 PM

Please respond to an...@au...

Sent by:  lse...@li...


To:   lse...@li...
cc:
Subject:  [Lse-tech] Where should benchmark data really go?



Hello,

I am about to release a bunch of NetBench results on linux 2.4, and it
occurred to me we may have an organizational problem.  We have a sister
project, LBS, which was designated for benchmarks.  However, we often
discuss
benchmarks on this list and even have benchmark results (scheduler) on
http://lse.sourceforge.net.  Also, none of the benchmarks results we
discuss
are on http://lbs.sourceforge.net.  I have created
http://lse.sourceforge.net/benchmarks, and I would be happy to volunteer
moving the LBS intro page to it, but I want to get some feedback on the
right
thing to do here.  Personally, working with one project is more efficient
than two, so I'd prefer we keep all discussions and benchmarks on LSE.
Please let me know what you prefer.

Andrew Theurer
IBM LTC

_______________________________________________
Lse-tech mailing list
Lse...@li...
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lse-tech