From: Arjan v. de V. <ar...@in...> - 2006-02-27 13:07:31
|
On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 17:59 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote: > > your sysctl functions sleep. the BKL is useless in the light of sleeping > > code... > > > > But wouldn't all sysctls potentially sleep (on account of copying data from > the user). .. I'm not the one saying the BKL was useful... you were ;) |