Activity for LPRng
-
grumpf_ committed [4340c5] on lprng
fix misleadingly indention
-
fix misleadingly indented
-
fix misleading indention
-
fix misleadingly indention
-
fix misleading-indentation
-
format
-
format
-
Summary: fix misleading-indentation
-
fix misleading-indentation
-
fix misleading-indentation
-
fix misleading-indentation
-
fix misleading-indentation
-
fix misleading-indentation
-
fix misleading-indentation
-
fix misleading-indentation
-
fix misleading-indentation
-
fix misleading-indentation
-
fix misleading-indentation
-
fix misleading-indentation
-
fix misleading-indentation
-
Paul Szabo posted a comment on ticket #41
Dear Peter, How did I notice. Have been merrily using LPRng for many years (my last patches seem to have been in 1998). Mostly my users print single copies, in fact printing multiple was discouraged, in a desire to save paper, with copies ignored in my LPR front-end wrapper script. But then, a user asked about printing multiple, that did not work though my LPR wrapper was not involved. The essence of the bug was in the way CUPS sends to LPD, see https://bugs.debian.org/1065157 While looking into...
-
Dear Peter, How did I notice. Have been merrily using LPRng for many years (my last patches seem to have been in 1998). Mostly my users print single copies, in fact printing multiple was discouraged, in a desire to save paper, with copies ignored in my LPR front-end wrapper script. But then, a user asked about printing multiple, that did not work though my LPR wrapper was not involved. The essence of the bug was in the way CUPS sends to LPD, see https://bugs.debian.org/1065157 While looking into...
-
Peter Radisson posted a comment on ticket #41
Hello, thanks for the patch, seems ok. The only problem i can imagine for now is that this bug was there for a long time, so some people may depend on this (aka never noticed), so i will think out it over the weekend. NTL: how did you notice, what was your usecase ? Am 15.03.24 um 03:34 schrieb Paul Szabo: [bugs:#41] Filters invoked with -h and -H set same Status: open Group: v1.0 (example) Created: Fri Mar 15, 2024 02:34 AM UTC by Paul Szabo Last Updated: Fri Mar 15, 2024 02:34 AM UTC Owner: nobody...
-
Filters invoked with -h and -H set same
-
LPRng released /lprng/LPRng-3.9.0/lprng-3.9.0.tar.gz
-
-
-
-
fix warnings
-
rm unused var
-
fix warnings
-
fix subdir-objects error
-
amdg created merge request #2
lpd: ipp, multiple bind, ipv6
-
Xavier posted a comment on discussion Help
What happened to the ipp patch ? in 2010 it looked trivial to merge (minor changes needed) and I thought it would happen some months after, but... Unfortunatly, I'm a beginner in C language and can't help. Note that it is difficult to contact the LPRng team without suscribing to the mailing-list.
-
bump revision to 3.9.0
-
A segmentation fault is reported in lpr on x86_64 platform in common/errormsg.c.
-
Tijs Van Buggenhout created merge request #1
Fix segmentation fault on x86_64 in Server_status
-
from: mdk369@users.sf.net
-
<REDACTED> created ticket #40
make_lpd_conf used for generating html files prints timestamps and causes build to be unreproducible
-
Luke created ticket #39
Error building ifhp with Clang 3.8
-
Please use the git version on sf. the Version on lprng.com ist the latest release...
-
Heinrich Mislik posted a comment on ticket #38
I used http://www.lprng.com/DISTRIB/LPRng/LPRng-3.8.35.tgz from http://www.lprng.com/downloads.html...
-
use correct return type for waitpid()
-
lpc move and number of copies
-
duplicate
-
Correctly check SSL connection
-
Hello Heinrich Mislik, you patch did not apply. Are you using the latest src ?
-
remove correct child from list
-
rpmbuild fails on RHEL 7
-
fixes and more ....
-
grumpf_@users.sf.net committed [74483c]
BUG FIX: do not delete random programs, really ...
-
grumpf_@users.sf.net committed [d5abd5]
add missing peer = SSL_get_peer_certificate(ssl);
-
grumpf_@users.sf.net committed [cec2ac]
FIX: clean the full buffer
-
grumpf_@users.sf.net committed [42c517]
add change
-
Insu Yun posted a comment on ticket #37
Hi. I am currently working on creating some static analyzer. That analyzer found...
-
hi, thx for the patch. How did you find that problem ?
-
Correctly check SSL connection
-
-
-
