From: Carl K. <ku...@us...> - 2001-02-21 23:55:55
|
> Documents within an IPP job do not have any sense of ordering. There is an IPP extension that does allow the client to specify the ord= er of documents. See: Internet Printing Protocol (IPP): Override Attributes for Documents and Pages IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group Standard 5100.4-2001 February 7, 2001 (ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_EXC/pwg5100.4.doc [and .rtf and .pdf= ]) 9.2 Send-Document and Send-URI Operation Requests Attributes are added to the Operation Attributes group. Group 1: Operation Attributes "input-document-number" (integer): The client OPTIONALLY supplies this attribute in order to inform the printer about the order of documents when the printer is sending the Input-Documents asynchronously. The= first Input-Document is 1, and subsequent Input-Documents = are numbered sequentially. If the value of "last-document" is= 'true', then the value of this attribute is also the total= number of Input-Documents in the Job. If a client supplie= s this attribute in one Send-Document or Send-URI operation = in a Job, it MUST send it in all such operations. A Printer dea= ls with missing Input-Documents in the same way as without th= is attribute except that a time-out can occur with Input-Documents anywhere in the Job. For example, a Printe= r could receive Input-Documents 1 and 3 and not 2. Danek Duvall <dd...@en...>@lists.sourceforge.net on 02/15/2001 04:34:02 PM Sent by: lpr...@li... To: Ben Woodard <be...@va...> cc: lpr...@li... Subject: [Lpr-discuss] Re: job and document semantics On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 03:10:35PM -0800, Ben Woodard wrote: > That makes things a lot easier. The only thing we have to pass is the= > IPP job ID. Do the send-documents have to be in any particular order > for them to be processed by IPP appropriately. Documents within an IPP job do not have any sense of ordering. That is= , you don't say `send document 4', you just send a document. The order t= hey come out on paper is the same as the order in which you send them, exce= pt that you might request collated or uncollated copies (i.e.: "a b a b" o= r "a a b b") and how things are stapled together (i.e., are a and b stapl= ed together, or is a one bound thing and b another). Wendy & Norm -- I was wrong about the complete lack of ordering. The s= pec (section 2.4.2 of RFC 2911) says that the document order "MUST be" eith= er "a b a b" (collated) or "a a b b" (uncollated). Danek _______________________________________________ Lpr-discuss mailing list Lpr...@li... http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lpr-discuss = |