|
From: Thomas W. <wa...@ho...> - 2007-08-27 12:47:45
|
Hi Konstantin,
from my point of view, there are no objections about removing =20
CategoryStream end of line enum. So let us clean up this.
Thanks for your helping hands ;-)
- waffel
Quoting Konstantin Litvinenko <Kon...@ma...>:
> Hello, Thomas!
> You wrote to <log...@li...> on Mon, 27 Aug 2007
> 12:41:17 +0200:
>
> TW> currently I cannot create our 1.0 release because I have one test cas=
e
> TW> which fails. Evtl. can anybody help me here?
>
> TW> Under my linux (gentoo) the testPattern test fails with following
> TW> error message:
>
> TW> PASS: testNDC
> TW> % 1 cat1:2007-08-27 12:25:15,780 (1188210315 / 1) [ERROR] ndc1 messag=
e
> TW> % (30000)
> ??>> message<
> ??>> message <
> TW> terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::length_error'
> TW> what(): basic_string::_S_create
> TW> /bin/sh: line 4: 23799 Aborted ${dir}$tst
> TW> FAIL: testPattern
>
> TW> Seems that the ConfigureFailure Exception is not used correct.
>
> TW> Hope we can fix this to create the relaese.
>
> I will look on it today.
> Is there any objections about removing CategoryStream end of line enum?
> Without it Solaris 10 build will be broken.
>
> With best regards, Konstantin Litvinenko.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
> Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
> Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
> Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Log4cpp-devel mailing list
> Log...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/log4cpp-devel
>
|