From: Thomas W. <wa...@ho...> - 2007-08-27 12:47:45
|
Hi Konstantin, from my point of view, there are no objections about removing =20 CategoryStream end of line enum. So let us clean up this. Thanks for your helping hands ;-) - waffel Quoting Konstantin Litvinenko <Kon...@ma...>: > Hello, Thomas! > You wrote to <log...@li...> on Mon, 27 Aug 2007 > 12:41:17 +0200: > > TW> currently I cannot create our 1.0 release because I have one test cas= e > TW> which fails. Evtl. can anybody help me here? > > TW> Under my linux (gentoo) the testPattern test fails with following > TW> error message: > > TW> PASS: testNDC > TW> % 1 cat1:2007-08-27 12:25:15,780 (1188210315 / 1) [ERROR] ndc1 messag= e > TW> % (30000) > ??>> message< > ??>> message < > TW> terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::length_error' > TW> what(): basic_string::_S_create > TW> /bin/sh: line 4: 23799 Aborted ${dir}$tst > TW> FAIL: testPattern > > TW> Seems that the ConfigureFailure Exception is not used correct. > > TW> Hope we can fix this to create the relaese. > > I will look on it today. > Is there any objections about removing CategoryStream end of line enum? > Without it Solaris 10 build will be broken. > > With best regards, Konstantin Litvinenko. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Log4cpp-devel mailing list > Log...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/log4cpp-devel > |