Re: [Lmuse-user] Lack of 1.0 hindering adoption

[Guy <say...@ti...>]

Guy wrote:

> Tim wrote:
>
>>> Maybe what the poster was implying was that people assume that a
>>> a project's 1.x version is going to be the better one to get than a 0.9
>>> version, which is somehow inferior. Tim.
>>>
>>>   
>>
> Hi
> Exactly!  Also, if you look at the ubuntu repositories muse is listed 
> as beta rather than stable. Is this duplicated elsewhere.
>
> I think that more people would be attracted to muse if there were a 
> 'stable' release (or a release labeled stable).  I have been noodling 
> with muse for quite a while now & feel it is worthy of that.  People 
> should be using muse as it is good.  Ardour doesn't have the midi 
> integration & I *much* prefer muse's interface to Rosegarden's, 
> especially the mixer & the fluidsynth integration too. (Go muse ....)
>
> The more people use an open source project the better the base of 
> people to help, from advice on the lists, to bug reporting & even 
> perhaps some more of you mighty coders (BTW: If you want any bad bash 
> scripts I would be more than happy to help :0)   ).  Anything that 
> increases muse's user base should be goos fro the project.
>
> Cheers
> Guy
>
>
>
>