From: Werner S. <ws...@se...> - 2007-12-11 19:04:01
|
Hi Guy, i agree with you that 0.9 should became stable 1.0 and the svn head revision should be labeled 2.0. Im currently busy with other projects (mainly mscore) but in januar i hope to have time coding on muse again starting with renaming it. Robert, what do you think? Werner On Montag 10 Dezember 2007, Guy wrote: > Hi > > I just want to put it to the muse developers that lack of a 1.0 release > is hindering adoption of muse. I was looking at ubuntu repositories & > it is still correctly listed as beta (in fact, when I last looked ubuntu > does not have even the 0.9 release). This isn't just about code but how > people *perceive* muse. > > Isn't 0.9 as good as what many that put out as a production release? > There don't seem to be any show stopper bugs. Leaving it as 0.9 will > colour peoples perception of what is a very powerful, usable & stable > app. I know another branch is being developed, but surely that should > be the 2.0 branch? > > Hope this will stimulate some discussion > > Guy |