Re: [Lmuse-developer] Some testing of new muse!

[Werner S. <ws...@se...>]

On Tuesday 20 January 2004 20:04, Robert Jonsson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > the fontsize changes when resising the window.
>
> What do you know it does :)
> To be called Bigtime it sure starts of small though ;).

right; i plan to make the initial size of all windows explicitly
configurable.

>
> > > - Couldn't remove a connection from input/Connections after having
> > > added capture_1 & 2
> > > - I had also added a track and an out, got connection from in->out, but
> > > only in one channel though both input and output had the 'S' clicked.
> > > Also If I clicked the 'S' there was no differeance in the number of
> > > possible inputs/outputs on any of the
> >
> > For Input-/Output strips you must 1. select a jack port 2. select a
> > channel (if there is more than on channel) and then click connect, 3.
> > repeat this for every channel of the strip (currently max. 2 channels
> > implemented).
>
> Channel as in left and right stereo ? I find this a bit confusing... would
> it be possible to add some feedback when flipping the Channel dropdown? I
> don't grasp how to use it. Seems like nothing changes...

granted its a bit confusing but i had no better gui idea; will think about
it again. A audio bus in MusE can have channels (as in stereo, quattro etc.).
Only on input/output strips this channels can individually connected
to different jack ports.


>
> What if I want to record a mono source but have it routed to both sides of
> a stereo track, would that be possible?

yes; if a input strip is mono and you route it to a stereo master the
pan pot on the input strip is just that. On stereo to stereo pan is
something like "stereo balance". Reouting mono input to a stereo track
for recording should work the same.

...
> > Without a graphic editor to edit automation values this is of course
> > not very useful at the moment.
>
> Oh, I misread this and for some reason thought you meant a list-editor.
> I actually never thought about it earlier, but wouldn't a list editor be
> quite useful too?
> Since there already are listeditors in muse I suppose it might be quite
> easy to implement?

a graphic editor is not easy to do and maybe a list editor is the way
to get things rolling somewhat faster

>
> > Thanks for testing,
>
> Oh, I'll test til my ears bleed. Thanks for so relentlessly developing. :)
>
> I'd like to get ontop of some development too, but that will have to wait a
> few months. :-/
> (Development project at work that is sucking all my programming steam. It's
> actually an interesting project but it sure drains the brain.)

isn't this true for all sw projects?


Regards,
Werner