From: Florian J. <flo...@we...> - 2012-04-24 22:16:04
|
Am 24.04.2012 11:52, schrieb Luis Garrido: > On 04/24/2012 11:12 AM, Florian Jung wrote: > > >> which is the problem, OSC, DSSI or both? >> > The LADSPA/DSSI specification. Not real way around it, I am afraid, > other than the obvious brute force approach of providing a big static > pool of ports as you suggest. However this will bloat state, automated > GUIs, port selection menus... > but OSC does support it? hrm, can i maybe create some "string" port which serializes all these information? > I remember a discussion of an extension to LV2 to provide dynamic ports, > but I don't really know if this was implemented or how... maybe with > dynamic manifest. This was one of the things LV2 was supposed to improve > over other plugin standards. > btw, what's about LV2 in muse? > You could maybe try a modular approach: one oscillator is one plugin, > and you can chain them externally using host routing, but most hosts are > not great at routing plugins this way. > no way! this would massively slow down my synth, probably making it unusable. and is ugly, btw ;) thanks flo > Luis > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > Lmuse-developer mailing list > Lmu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmuse-developer > > |