Re: [Lmuse-developer] about the translations

[Robert J. <spa...@gm...>]

I thought the pro files were left for the benefit of translations. If
there are no reasons left I vote for that we remove them, they cause
confusion.

Regards,
Robert


2011/9/15 Orcan Ogetbil <oge...@gm...>:
> Hi all,
>
> Since we left the qmake related .pro files in the source tree, it just
> occurred to me that there is some confusion for how to handle the
> translations.
>
> This is mostly my fault, I should probably have removed the .pro files
> when I did the translation work with cmake.
>
> Anyhow, just as a reminder, before updating the .ts files, please take
> a look at README.translation file. It has the information we need to
> handle translation updates. Also please do not use any other method,
> as we really do not want to lose existing strings.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Orcan
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Doing More with Less: The Next Generation Virtual Desktop
> What are the key obstacles that have prevented many mid-market businesses
> from deploying virtual desktops?   How do next-generation virtual desktops
> provide companies an easier-to-deploy, easier-to-manage and more affordable
> virtual desktop model.http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426474/
> _______________________________________________
> Lmuse-developer mailing list
> Lmu...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmuse-developer
>