From: Luis G. <lui...@us...> - 2011-04-14 06:15:23
|
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 3:51 AM, Tim E. Real <ter...@ro...> wrote: > Actually that alone did not help. > I had to put a 300ms delay just before sending all the values > in that update routine. > I wonder if using a delay is good enough. If so, I wonder if 300ms is OK. > (Hmm, how to tell when (any) gui is really ready to begin receiving > update messages?) > I'm thinking if update is being called that means the gui > /should/ be ready by then, so it really is a simple delay issue > (no 'wait' required), so we're OK... The GUI should be ready by then and no delay at all should be necessary. :-? |