From: Robert J. <spa...@gm...> - 2010-04-04 15:38:37
|
Hi, This is actually halfway implemented. If no track is armed the selected track will be armed when the global arm button (or *) is pressed. Off the top of my head it makes sense to enhance this with moving the armed track when selecting tracks too. The only deficiency is a way to solve arming several tracks. Best is probably to enable this feature when exactly one track is armed, if more are armed the moving will be disabled. /Robert 2010/4/4 alex stone <com...@gm...>: > I've just joined and not sure how to add to an existing archive post, > so i'll post this as a new entry, but it's in reference to Geoff > Beasley's idea for "switching" tracks, and having the record-arm > follow. > > I'll add my vote for this feature. When working in a midi track, > record-arm is required (obviously), but when switching to another > track, with the intention of working quickly across multiple tracks, > having to manually record-disarm, then manually record-arm the next > track slows the workflow down. If we can just switch tracks, and have > the first track disarm, and the new track arm, as a default, or user > selected option, it would speed things up. > > A good idea, imho. > > Alex. > > p.s. Thanks for increasing the number of midi ports. That helps. > > -- > www.openoctave.org > > mid...@op... > dev...@op... > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > _______________________________________________ > Lmuse-developer mailing list > Lmu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmuse-developer > |