Re: [LMMS-devel] VST header

[Tobias D. <tob...@gm...>]

> That may be true for people who have signed Steinberg's license, but I'm
> not bound to that. Besides, look at Samba and WINE, they have reverse
> engineering origins.
ok, didn't know that ;-)

> > However it'd be nice to send
> > me the header directly, before having cleared the stuff described
> > above...
>
> Since you have signed Steinberg's license (haven't you?), it's better to
> submit this to a public list. The feedback you're allowed to provide me
> is minimal, somewhat restricted to "this plugin works, this plugin
> doesn't".
Actually I didn't sign the license (it's even the first time that I really=
=20
read it a few minutes ago....), as I'm not selling the software (LMMS) but=
=20
making it freely available to others. Furthermore this license only covers=
=20
VST SDK 2.3 and 2.4, but not 2.0 etc. which can be downloaded from=20
audacity-CVS without any license-displaying at all... (I mean the link=20
mentioned by configure when headers are missing) I don't know whether all=20
this is legal but nobody complained so far :-) Therefore I see no problem i=
n=20
helping to develop your header, or am I wrong?

toby