Re: [LMMS-devel] Is there a reason that libstk is not bundled?

[Jonathan A. <eag...@gm...>]

Im not suggesting that I am trying to think long term.


On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Lukas W. <luk...@gm...> wrote:

> Why do you even want to move away from stk? It has always been working
> fine, I don't see any reason why we should change this.
>
>
> 2014-04-21 18:05 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Aquilina <eag...@gm...>:
> > You mentioned mallets using stk. What aspects of stk are used by mallets
> > that we cant code into our own code base to move away from requiring stk.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Vesa <di...@nb...> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 04/21/2014 06:59 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> >> > There can be though i guess it depends on what it needs in it etc.
> >>
> >> No, I mean if we're using libstk as a dependency, then we're using it
> >> as-is, there is no LMMS-specific changes in it. If it's not bundled in
> >> our source tree, then there can't be any customizations.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jonathan Aquilina
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Start Your Social Network Today - Download eXo Platform
> > Build your Enterprise Intranet with eXo Platform Software
> > Java Based Open Source Intranet - Social, Extensible, Cloud Ready
> > Get Started Now And Turn Your Intranet Into A Collaboration Platform
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/ExoPlatform
> > _______________________________________________
> > LMMS-devel mailing list
> > LMM...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
> >
>



-- 
Jonathan Aquilina