Re: [LMMS-devel] 32bit vs. 64bit why?

[David G. <dg...@gm...>]

On 21 March 2014 13:05, Israel <isr...@gm...> wrote:

> It just seems that 64bit wine has a lot of issues not running many things.
> Sorry if I was offensive there, I didn't mean to be.
> I am simply wondering if building a 32bit only lmms will solve the
> problems for everyone involved....  this may not be the case, of
> course...  so I was asking if (theoretically) this would be the best route.
> I also run 64bit, and never use VST, and don't have wine installed.
> I am not trying to remove any functionality or deprecate anything that
> is already awesome.


I suppose the easiest way would be to see if there's any perceptible
end-user difference between 32-bit and 64-bit other than the VSTs.
(There shouldn't be, unless there's something in LMMS that could
possibly use more than 4GB in a lump ;-) )

At present I run an LMMS built from github source on 64-bit Ubuntu
14.04. Is there a simple configure option to build as 32-bit?


- d.