From: Raine M. E. <ra...@ik...> - 2014-03-06 07:45:31
|
Citerar Vesa <di...@nb...>: > Actually now that I think about this, I think this is one thing we could > do before 1.0.0 (since it will break backwards compatibility): modify > time signature so that the denominator is constrained to binary > exponents, like it is on actual time signatures. Time sigs that LMMS > allows - such as 5/9, 3/11, etc. - make no sense as time sigs, and they > cause weird behaviour, because they produce tact lengths that don't > correspond to any actual note sizes (apart from the tick-sized 192th > notes...) It's the cutting edge of modern music, really: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_signature#Irrational_meters :) -- ra...@ik... softrabbit on #lmms |