From: Raine M. E. <ra...@ik...> - 2014-03-05 15:45:45
|
Citerar Vesa <di...@nb...>: > I think we should rather move to a model, where instead of one global > time signature we could just allow setting a time signature for each > pattern individually - you could mix in 5/8 patterns at the same time > with 3/9 patterns, at the same time. This would be implemented for both > melodic and beat patterns. This would also pave the way for adding other > neat timing-based effects such as shuffle. Sounds like a crazy idea. But probably not too hard to implement, time signature should logically be mostly a UI thing anyway. Hopefully it's all ticks on deeper levels... > This would allow cleaner implementations in many cases, I seem to notice > that the current time sig system causes many issues in many parts of the > software... even now there are multiple open issues all related to time > sig in one way or another. Bad math and bad assumptions will remain even if the time signature is local instead of global. -- ra...@ik... softrabbit on #lmms |