From: Vesa <di...@nb...> - 2014-03-03 22:37:48
|
On 03/04/2014 12:28 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > > What about point releases? > > What about them? I'm going by the version scheme that was agreed on earlier. x.y.z = year.quarter.increment, where 2014 = 1, and y and z are 0-based. So as soon as we're in April, the version number bumps to 1.1.0. Ok so, I changed the 1.0.1 milestone name to 1.1.0 since we most likely won't have time to release any 1.0.1 (and even if we do it'll probably be just a bugfix). I also updated the due date for 1.0.0 to 2 weeks from now, that way we at least have some estimate of a release date again, and a deadline that we can try to meet. I'm starting to think though that we should just release on that date, no matter if there are still some bugs, because it's better than continuously postponing - we can always release a bugfix later, but the release would satisfy users and packagers, and we're already in a much more usable state than what 0.4.15 was. |