From: Tres F. <tre...@gm...> - 2014-02-13 21:10:46
|
*correction: *FreeST links:* http://www.joebutton.co.uk/fst/ (5 yrs old) http://repo.or.cz/w/fst.git (3 yrs old) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59524 (recent) - Tre...@gm... On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Tres Finocchiaro < tre...@gm...> wrote: > If there's a clean-room implementation of the VST API these days > > > It seems there is something called FST or FreeST which achieves this. > > It addresses the direct violation by using the steinberg headers. > > According to this message board, it was originally written by an LMMS > developer. Is this true? Has the this email just come full circle? > > -Tres > > *Message board:* > > http://csound.1045644.n5.nabble.com/Cleanroom-reverse-engineered-vst-headers-td1134994.html > > *FreeST links:* > http://www.joebutton.co.uk/fst/ (5 years old) > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59524 (3 years old) > http://repo.or.cz/w/fst.git (updated recently) > > > |