From: Jon-Francis B. <jf...@in...> - 2009-06-28 07:28:48
|
2009/6/28 Jon-Francis Bhreitheamhnaigh <jf...@in...>: > Not sure if anyone else has pointed this out yet, but I downloaded the > BMP package that's available via that popular torrent site out of > curiousity and noticed something that you need to rectify, Aaron. When > distributing binaries without source code, you must inform the user > where they can obtain the source code that corresponds to the packaged > binary. From what I can tell this hasn't been done (at least, after a > spending a few minutes looking I found no such notice). Now, to comply > with the GPL you need to make the source code available yourself; you > can't just link to Sourceforge, for example. As I was saying > yesterday, the source and binaries *must* come through the same > channel. Last one from me, for today. And sorry for all the noise... Seems I was mistaken in thinking that you were really distributing LMMS with default branding and such. Silly me for not being more thorough. Whether or not you're currently doing this though is something that you can hopefully shed some light upon... Best, J-F (really really gone now) |