Re: [LMMS-devel] Fedora package, license question

[Thomas M. <tho...@gm...>]

Paul Wayper wrote:
> A fair number of projects will care a lot about the license, and won't allow
> their packagers to distribute files for which the license is unknown or
> ambiguous.  So saying 'just distribute what we've got and we'll sort it out
> later isn't really an option, at least for Fedora (to my understanding).

Absolutely.

What about this: We (I maybe) create a wiki page in the lmms wiki with
the list of samples, projects and presets, as to track their respective
license and/or status (e.g. to be omitted from the next release), and
you help me filling that out as time permits.

Meanwhile I import the package into Fedora with all these files removed
(so people have the program at least), and can gradually bring in stuff
back, in later releases of the rpm package.

Thoughts?

- Thomas