Re: [LMMS-devel] Some Ideas

[<en...@in...>]

Hi Alex, thank you for your ideas.

About filtering: is what you propose linked to the fact that it is 
difficult to automate filters with linear scale - that is 0 100 200 300 
....1000 1100...2000 2100...? It is rather a known problem, frequency 
scale would behave probably better if it would be logaritmically spaced 
(equispaced knob movement between [10  100] and [100 1000] for example: 
as you will notice the difference between 10000 Hz and 11000 Hz is 
almost unhearable, while the difference between 1000 and 2000 is always 
1000 but it's much more hearable). Skiessi, any news about that?

Enrico

Alex Iadicicco ha scritto:
> LMMS Developers,
>
> I'm a big fan of LMMS. I truly enjoy using LMMS for making all sorts of
> music. You can hear some of the stuff I've made at theta4.newgrounds.com
>
> BUT, because I've been using LMMS for a while, I've gotten some ideas. I
> didn't know where to put them, so I figured I'd send an email to this list.
>
> The three I would like to see most are:
>
> - Automation range options, where the user can select the highest and
> lowest values an automation can be. This one is good for filters, when I'd
> rather automate from 200 Hz to 3 kHz on a filter, rather than the default 0
> Hz to 14 kHz.
> - Pitch envelope
> - Something that allows the user to select any control and make it a
> per-note property (like pan and velocity are in 0.4.2)
>
> Thank you for your consideration. Also, I'll probably get more ideas in the
> future, so if I shouldn't email my ideas to this list, I'd appreciate if
> someone could tell me where I should be sending my ideas.
>
> --alex
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> LMMS-devel mailing list
> LMM...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
>
>
>