From: Presto <dj_...@ho...> - 2008-09-27 14:44:16
|
This is similar to the point that I was trying to make in the post just below this one. http://www.nabble.com/Per-track-Jack-Output--to19561379.html I'm not sure if I think it's a good idea to have everyone combine to work on a single project. I'm all for collaboration but I think that'll end up in a "too many cooks in the kitchen" type effect and be harder to organize. What I do love is the idea of JACK. Allowing each program to work in harmony with each other to take advantage of each of the tools strengths is just smart. In my opinion this is a better way to collaborate. I couldn’t agree more with the points made by others that writing code for functions that already exist and perform well in other programs is redundant. Unless you see a flaw, or room for improvement then you are “just reinventing the wheel”. “If it ain’t broken don’t fix it”. If you look at it in a hardware environment, have you ever seen a professional studio with only one single piece of equipment in it? No. There are keyboards, samplers, mixers, effect processors, hard disk recorders, microphones, guitars, amplifiers, speakers and the list could go on forever depending on the studio. All of them purchased because they are the best tool at performing a task. All of these tools have also been made with standards that allow them to connect to each other and work in unison. Either through audio cables or midi they all get routed to some master output to collaborate on a final product. I’m pretty new to the world of free software. But I like what I see. What I love is that when there seems to be a hole or something missing, people start a project to meet that need. I just think that the better these programs can work with each other, the fewer holes there would be. Just my two cents! LMMS is the future!!!! -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Hola%2C-os-envio-una-idea.-tp19601010p19691896.html Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |