Re: [Lmms-users] Remove surround-support?

[Paul W. <pa...@ma...>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Grzegorz Nowak wrote:
| On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 7:28 PM, Tobias Doerffel
| <tob...@gm...> wrote:
|> Hi,
|>
|> I'm thinking about removing surround support completely. Already now it's not
|> really supported anymore and adding surround-support to FX-mixer-lines would
|> be a little work. In general things could be speeded up a bit without surround
|> so what's your oppinion?
|>
|> toby
|
| I agree.

I agree too.  It'd be kind of nice to have true quadraphonic output, but since
it's a complete sham as it is it might as well be ditched for clarity.  If
someone wants to write a separate set of code, say around version 2.7.5, to do
~ cranioaural and three-dimensional sound source modelling with reflections,
reverb, phase shifting and equalisation changes, then that'd be doing it properly.

I demoed LMMS 0.4 at my Linux group the other night and it worked very well.
I've also had my proposal accepted to speak at the Open Source Developers
Conference about writing documentation, based on my experiences with writing
the documentation for LMMS (which I am about to get back into for the 0.4
release).  When there's a link to my materials up I'll let you know more about
the talk.  I'm also going to be submitting a similar talk proposal for LCA
2009 in Hobart, and I encourage Toby and/or Paul G. to put a talk proposal in
on the technical challenges of converting a large project to Qt 4 / MVC /
Cmake / all three (and apply for travel assistance).

Have fun,


Paul
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkiNxR8ACgkQu7W0U8VsXYLaYQCZAaBVF5vUidRXBKDqksV+nIYt
DHAAn3kJkJ3OXgqYECFs1IYFvYTbSdQ/
=Udht
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----