Re: [Lksctp-developers] Modifying FTP/TFTP for SCTP

[Jon G. <jg...@us...>]

Is this SOCK_STREAM or SOCK_SEQPACKET?  I wonder if the application is 
having issues with the COMM_UP notification?  The association is 
established, then I see a recvmsg() followed directly by a close().

<snip...>

> +++sctp_inq_pop+++ chunk c1814cc0[COOKIE_ACK], length 4, skb->len 0
> sctp_do_sm prefn: ep c3e5d880, EVENT_T_CHUNK, COOKIE_ACK, asoc
> c38ba000[STATE_COOKIE_ECHOED], sctp_sf_do_5_1E_ca sctp_do_sm postfn:
> asoc c38ba000, status: DISPOSITION_CONSUME
> sm_sideff: event_up: c3ea83b0, ulpq: c38bb58c.
> sctp_do_sm post sfx: error 0, asoc c38ba000[STATE_ESTABLISHED]
> sctp_recvmsg(sk: c2f0a7a0, msghdr: c1e2df08, len: 1024, knoblauch: 0,
> flags: 0x0, addr_len: c1e2de34)
> Timeout: timeo: 2147483647, MAX: 2147483647.
> sctp_close(sk: 0xc2f0a7a0...)


<snip....>

> 
> 
> Is record-based equivalent to SCTP's message-oriented feature? I guess
> applications are divided into record-based and stream-based as well?
> 

Yes, I mean message-oriented here.

> Regards,
> Se-Hsieng