From: Nils C. <nil...@lu...> - 2010-01-21 23:03:33
|
Sounds good to me, would you consider submitting a patch to remove the experimental label? Would be most useful as our distributor won't take responsibility for anything marked experimental. Cheers, Nils On Oct 12, 2009, at 3:52 PM, Vlad Yasevich wrote: > Nils Carlson wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> To what degree is the kernel SCTP implementation still experimental? >> The company for which I'm consulting currently uses several >> proprietary SCTP stacks, but we're looking to replace them with the >> kernel stack, if it's sufficiently stable and complete. >> >> I took a look at the web-page, but there seems to be little >> information as to the completeness, a number of outstanding bugs is >> about all. Any and all information much appreciated. > > I am guessing it's time to get rid of Experimental Status. It's been > part of the mainline kernel since the very beginning. > > The base protocol is complete and there are multiple extensions that > have been added. The API is the only thing thats kind-of in flux. > Once > the spec comes out and we implement it, the implementation will > definitely stop bing experimental. > > I know of multiple providers that use the in-kernel SCTP stack with > very hight degree of reliability. This is where you would have > to evaluate the implementation. > > -vlad > >> >> Cheers, >> >> Nils >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA >> is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart >> your >> developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market >> and stay >> ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference >> _______________________________________________ >> Lksctp-developers mailing list >> Lks...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lksctp-developers >> |