Re: [lkcd-devel] Re: cvs commit

[Piet/Pete D. <pi...@sg...>]

On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 11:59:14PM -0700, Piet/Pete Delaney wrote:
> > 
> > The fork for 2.5 was intended to be for both kernel and user changes.
> > Let's do this _after_ 4.1, as we _previously_ agreed to before we
> > waited for your work to finalize.  I don't want to see us change that
> > plan, especially now.
> 
> Ok, but I don't see why we can't export lkcdutils and inport a lkcdutils-2.4
> and limit the changes in lkcdutils-2.4 to minor bug fixes. I don't
> recall _previously_ agreeing. Perhaps I was asleep or Tom did. It's not
> a big deal I have a couple difficult bugs to look at.

I was refering to  _previously_ agreeing on the having only the almost 
froozen lkcdutils for substantial period of time. Sure, I recall _previously_ 
agreeing on making the 2.4 release with a preliminary ia64 framework in place.
Actaully I had not intention that we wait as long as we have. Just thought
I might not have been clear.

Don't sweat it.

-piet