Re: [Lives-users] freior effect

[<tyr...@fr...>]

Selon sal...@xs...:

> On Fri, April 16, 2010 14:20, tyr...@fr... wrote:
> > Selon sal...@xs...:
> >
> >> On Fri, April 16, 2010 11:37, jeremy AMMD wrote:
> >> > hi!
> >> > I'm using LiVES 1.3.2, and have some effects that not appears in the
> >> > effect
> >> > list.
> >> > (like FreiOr Glow, or FreiOr TehroXXor), i've got some other Freior
> >> effect
> >> > which appears, and they seem to work.
> >> > Frei0r libs (including dev) are installed on my computer, and frei0r.h
> >> > does
> >> > appear in the logs of ./configure.
> >> >
> >>
> >> I don't know what the problem is on your machine. All of the frei0r
> >> plugins are loading here, including the two which you mentioned.
> >>
> >> Gabriel.
> >
> > Hello Gabriel,
> >
> > I'm with Jeremy now.
> > I do not understand either. Could it be that some of the plugs have been
> > installed after compilation of LiVES, and thus aren't "listed" in
> > frei0r.so?
> >
> > Thanks a lot.
> > Aurélien
> >
> >
>
> No, that's not possible either, because the frei0r wrapper scans for
> plugins when LiVES starts up. It will load any plugins it finds.
>

OK.

> All I can suggest is that you try compiling the frei0r plugins yourself
> from source.


Hmmmm. I think it won't work. Actually, we're using a Debian Squeeze distro, and
we have the very same setup for frei0r on a second machine with this very same
distribution, but with lives 1.2.1, and on this machine, all the plugins appear.
The only difference (on first approach) between these two machines is that the
one which is working runs in 32 bits, and the one on which we cannot get the
plugins appearing runs in 64 bits. But as you said a bit before that LiVES had
to be fully 64 bits-friendly, I think that's not the point.