|
From: Paul F. <pg...@fo...> - 2026-05-27 18:35:35
|
thomas wrote: > the command in question is 'ln', not 'ls'. AFAICS there is no option -r > for ln, please see: oops!! embarrassing! time for new glasses. or bigger fonts!! sorry for the noise. paul =---------------------- paul fox, pg...@fo... (arlington, ma, where it's 85.3 degrees) |