|
From: Albert H. <al...@hu...> - 2016-05-26 13:57:37
|
HI, interesting stuff! good to know there is a better chip than the FT232R, and that there's support inside LIRC for it. (I've updated my blog to mention your's) regards, Albert Huitsing Op 26-05-16 om 15:24 schreef Will Manley: > On Mon, 25 Apr 2016, at 10:38, Will Manley wrote: >> On Wed, 20 Apr 2016, at 19:54, Jasper wrote: >>> I see there is active development on the FTDI driver/plugin and hope that >>> someone here may be able to give me some clues to help get this going. >> We've found the FT232R to have unreliable timing in bitbang mode. >> Depending on the receiver this can cause missed keypresses. I would >> recommend the FT230X series instead >> http://www.ftdichip.com/Support/Documents/DataSheets/Modules/DS_UMFT201_220_230XB.pdf >> . > My colleague Dave has written up a summary of some of the testing we've > performed on the FT232R and the FT230X here: > > https://stb-tester.com/blog/2016/05/26/ir-post-mortem > > I thought some of you may be interested. > > Thanks > > Will > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who > bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM > restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the > apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched! > https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j |