Re: Re[2]: lirc_sir, device or resource busy

[Wgge <wgg...@gm...>]

Jarod Wilson <jarod@...> writes:

> Nope, that's the right place, and while you may have built and
> installed bits from there, I'm positive that's not what you're
> actually seeing load on your system. chardev 61 went away quite
> a few months ago. We use a dynamic miscdev now, which typically
> ends up being something in the high 240s or low 250s. Look in
> your kernel tree, see if there isn't another lirc_dev.ko and
> lirc_sir.ko.

Same problem seen. If chardev 61 is gone, why we see configure scripts default
it to 61?
--with-major=value      specify the device major for the driver (61)
This is also seen in gcc options when making:
 -DIRCTL_DEV_MAJOR=61