Re: CIR chipset Winbond WPC876xL

[Léo <leo...@ya...>]

Hi, Juan,

> Please try editing lirc_wpc8769l.h and changing the value
> of
> WPC8769L_USECS_PER_BYTE so that it's 400 instead of
> 444. Then
> recompile,

I did it. The remote is working, but with the keypress doubling problem. And, again, doubling the gap value, solved the keypress doubling problem. Is there some documentation about what means this param in lircd.conf?

Thanks


--- Em qua, 21/1/09, Juan Jesús García de Soria Lucena <ska...@gm...> escreveu:

> De: Juan Jesús García de Soria Lucena <ska...@gm...>
> Assunto: Re: CIR chipset Winbond WPC876xL
> Para: leo...@ya...
> Cc: lir...@li...
> Data: Quarta-feira, 21 de Janeiro de 2009, 3:45
> Hi, Léo.
> 
> 2009/1/21 Léo <leo...@ya...>:
> > I generated the lircd.conf using irrecord and values
> are quite different:
> 
> Please try editing lirc_wpc8769l.h and changing the value
> of
> WPC8769L_USECS_PER_BYTE so that it's 400 instead of
> 444. Then
> recompile, reinstall and reload the module, and check
> whether the
> original file lirc_CVS/remotes/creative/lircd.conf.infracd
> starts
> behaving properly.
> 
> > Curiously, irrecord couldn't adjust gap parameter
> coorectly by itself. But, I noted that each touch in a
> button made the action twice. So I multiplicated irrecord
> gap value by 2, fine adjusted it mannually and it worked.
> With that configuration, the remote is working perfectly,
> even if I press a button repeatidly (even fast).
> >
> > By the way, the exact gap value output by irrecord was
> 119622.
> 
> I don't know about the keypress doubling. If the value
> suggested above
> is better than the previous one, the reported gap value
> could become
> more stable.
> 
> > Codes for the keys are exactly identical, don't
> worry about it.
> 
> Nice.
> 
> 
> Best regards, and thanks,
> 
>    JJ.
> 
> -- 
> Dream small if success is enough for you; dream big if you
> need to
> change the world.


      Veja quais são os assuntos do momento no Yahoo! +Buscados
http://br.maisbuscados.yahoo.com