From: <li...@ba...> - 2008-02-09 18:21:02
|
Hi! "gre...@op..." wrote: [...] > Some time ago, I submitted this patch in the hope that it would [...] > the special handling that was added with my patch. The attached > patch solves this issue by reorganising the code so it looks for > the unused event first, and then reads the next event and > processes it as if it were received as a single event. When it > is handled this way, my special spurious repeat detection > gets applied. Applied. Thanks. Christoph |