|
From: <li...@ba...> - 2007-06-17 13:35:17
|
Hi! Lo=EFc Dardant "loi...@gm..." wrote: [...] >> 4. GUI for irrecord > What do you mean for this GUI ? Have you seen my mail about UMC ? > I have no response of you, about the new name space. Have you seen my try > about an applet for Lirc ? > > I want to create of team for Lirc in UMC, so I guess we can do some work > together. What I mean is to simply convert irrecord from a console only program to =20 a more user-friendly GUI based program. I guess the applet you are =20 thinking of is more focussed on lircrc configuration. Well, about the new name space: I think it is a good idea and I support =20 this. Still not fully solved to me is what to do with button names that =20 cannot be mapped to the input name space. Also interesting would be to run your scripts on all remote control =20 definitions on lirc.org, not only the ones bundled in the source =20 tarball. One of the next features I will include in lircd is to provide a lirc =20 based input device using uinput. That means once we have a config file =20 fully based on the input name space, lircd will be able to convert IR =20 input directly to key events that can be received by all applications =20 without further configuration. Cf. my discussion with Jon Smirl on the =20 LKML a while ago. Christoph |