Re: lirc_serial bugfix

[Andrei T. <an...@un...>]

> I explained to you why I have chosen a different approach.
> If you can give arguments why your solution is better than mine I will  
> be happy to accept it.
>   
My solution is better simply because it works, yours does nothing as I 
explained a couple of letters ago. What other arguments do you expect me 
to provide? I don't disagree that there may be users using this driver 
with incorrect setting, and I even offered to work on a solution that 
won't break things for them, but you just ignored that part somehow.

> Have you tested if the code in CVS solved the problem?
>   
Yes, and as I explained - it only works if there's IR activity within 15 
seconds after resume, otherwise the driver switches to the same 
"inverted" mode and LIRC does not recognize anything.

This is my last letter on this topic unless you can actually suggest 
something constructive or accept that just possibly you might have been 
mistaken.